有一道英语选择题,偶看了答案很迷茫,思来想去想不通,

编辑: admin           2017-20-02         

    1 Euthanasia is humane because it heops to hasten the death of terminally ill patients.

    2 Death,as natural as birth,is sometimes a hare process that requires assistance,and euthanasia is part of such assistance.

    不好

    1 Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession,for euthanansia is a vilation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.

    2 Nothing can be more brutal than taking away human life.

    提示:

    好处是自己能无痛苦死亡,

    坏处是亲人痛苦。

    类似问题

    类似问题1:关于安乐死的一个辩论 求材料急 明天就辩论了[英语科目]

    现代的安乐死,来源于希腊词euthanasia,这个词有两部份组成:前缀eu-意思是

    美好的、善意的、有助的;词根 -thanasia,意思是致死,或使生命结束,二者结

    合构成一个新词,译为中文“安乐死”. 作为现代的科学术语,意思是“对无法

    治愈的疾病,好意地帮助患者死亡,或使他致死”,没有明确使用什么方法. 从

    法律的意义说,对病者采用安乐死的措施,个人无权,必须有法律依据和见证人,

    如患者自己的志愿要求,或者家属恳求,或者法制机构的决议.

    Modern euthanasia, and whether he considers comes from the Greek

    word, the word has two parts :Prefix eu- mean better goodwill and

    help. Roots -thanasia mean deathor over, the two will form a new

    word, the Chinese translation of "euthanasia."As modern science

    jargon, which means "no cure for the disease, sympathetic help

    patients died, or his death."not clear what methods were being

    used.From the legal significance of the patients using euthanasia,

    the right individual must have a legal basis and witnesses.If the

    voluntary patients, or family members begged or legal bodies.

    (一) 西方现代的思潮,宗教信仰单薄,讨论安乐死话题,都避免宗教伦理,只从社

    会意义和生命价值以实用主义分析. 如果一个人失去了生存能力,对社会没有了

    贡献,也就失去了生命的意义,减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担.

    (二) 安乐死可以彻底消除病人的疾病痛苦,精神压力和思想懮愁.

    (三) 人总难免一死,早晚都是死;一死百了,死人活人都解脱,患者与亲朋皆大欢

    喜.(四) 人的生命属于自己,个人有权结束生命,这是个人自由和独享的人权.

    modern Western ideas and religious beliefs of our topic of

    discussion of euthanasia, to avoid religious ethics.only social

    meaning and value of life in a pragmatic analysis.If a person loses

    the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the

    meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.

    (2) the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful

    diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.(C) a person

    bound to die sooner or later die; One hundred dead, the living dead

    are free, patients and relatives reflex happy.(D) the lives of

    their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives,

    which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.

    美国全国民意研究所抽样调查,赞成安乐死的1947年为37%,1973年上升到51%,

    1983年为63%,近年则达到了72%.

    National Institute of public opinion poll in 1947 to 37% in favor

    of euthanasia.51%,1983, rising to 63% in 1973, reached 72% in

    recent years.

    法律作为一种规范社会的工具,是应顺应社会要求的.二战以来,安乐死合法化

    的呼声越来越高.安乐死作为人的权利在世界范围都具有普遍意义,其立法工作也

    势在必行.随着时间的推移,安乐死在我国已成为一个新的社会问题,已成为社会

    需要的强烈表现.而我国通常认为实施安乐死是一种犯罪,这种“一棒子打死”的

    做法已不符合社会需求,因此,在我国制定一部有关安乐死的法律来完善对生命权

    保护的法律体系,加大对生命保护的力度,不但具有理论上的可行性,也具有积极

    的现实意义.

    The law as a tool for social norms that are responsive to community

    needs.Since World War II, increasing demands for the legalization

    of euthanasia.Euthanasia as the rights are of universal

    significance in the world, its legislative work is imperative.With

    the passage of time, euthanasia in China has become a new social

    problem, has become a strong performance needs of the

    community.China, the practice of euthanasia is a crime that often,

    "killed a stick" approach that do not conform to the needs of

    society.Therefore, in China to enact a law on euthanasia to perfect

    the legal system to protect the right to life.intensify efforts to

    protect the lives of not only theoretical feasibility are positive

    and practical significance.

    综上所述,无论在外国还是我国,无论以情理分析,还是以法理分析,安乐死

    合法化都是可行的.但是,任何事都不可能一蹴而就,但我们要以积极的态度把“

    安乐死”纳入法制轨道.从目前我国整体的经济发展水平,法律建设状况和医疗保

    障水准等方面看,现在为安乐死全面立法的确有些不现实,我们不妨报着积极的态

    度,为安乐死立法创造条件.比照近些年的“税收”试点(已收到很好效果)我们

    可以在我国东部一些经济,科技,文化发达的城市做一些“试点”工作之后,先为

    安乐死“打开半扇门”,在人们可以接受的程度内为安乐死部分立法,确定哪些安

    乐死可以允许,哪些应当禁止,并随着社会的发展给予其修订与改正,等待我国东

    西部经济差距缩小,再把该结果推向全国.

    In short, whether in a foreign country or in China, both in

    reasonable analysis, or to a legal analysislegalization of

    euthanasia are feasible.However, things could not be accomplished

    overnight, but we have to adopt a positive attitude "euthanasia"

    into the orbit of the legal system.From the current level of

    overall economic development, the legal aspects of building

    conditions and the standard of medical care,Euthanasia is indeed

    unrealistic for comprehensive legislation now, we might think with

    a positive attitude,create conditions for euthanasia

    legislation.Follow the recent "tax" on a trial basis (received good

    results) we can in some eastern economic, technological,Cultural

    developed cities do some "experimental" work, the first to sleep,

    "half-open door."To the extent that it was acceptable in some

    euthanasia legislation can determine which allow euthanasia, which

    should be prohibited,With the development of society and its

    amendments and corrections, waiting to narrow the economic gap

    between east and west China.then the results to the country.

    正方:支持安乐死

    各位来宾,大家好.

    我想大家都知道,生存是一件关乎尊严以及伦理道德的事情,没有人会轻易地去选

    择死亡,但是,也没有人愿意去承受“生命不能承受之轻”.我方观点认为:安乐

    死是尊重生命的一种方式.

    "安乐死"一词源于希腊文,意思是"幸福"的死亡.它包括两层含义,一是无痛苦的

    死亡;二是无痛致死术;而在我国对安乐死的定义为:患不治之症的病人在垂危状

    态下,由于精神和躯体的极端痛苦,在病人和其亲友的要求下,经医生认可,用人

    道方法使病人在无痛苦状态中结束生命过程;

    首先,从主观方面来讲,安乐死对于病人自身,是一种减少生命痛苦的方式.

    人,总是趋利避害的,没有人会说“我要去寻找痛苦,我要去远离快乐”.当一个

    人处于精神和躯体的极端痛苦之下,当生命的存在已成为一场噩梦,我们难道还要

    提及道德和伦理吗?生存这个基本的“长度”都已经不能够维持,还要来谈及生命

    的宽度,还要去顾及伦理的重量吗?

    北京大学法学博士徐景和认为,《宪法》规定公民人身自由与人格尊严不受侵犯,

    是有特定含义的.公民个人有权选择生存的方式,在特定条件下也有权选择死亡的

    方式.“安乐死”是一种在特殊情况下,在不违背国家、社会和他人利益的情况下

    所采取的一种对生命的特殊处分方式,这种处分是有严格的条件与程序的.我方所

    说的安乐死,不是随意地去选择死亡,而是按徐博士的理论,依照严格条件和程序

    去实施的事情.

    1999年11月1日,贵州一位晚期肝癌患者向全社会公开吐露了自己的心声:"谁能帮

    我实现安乐死?"据不完全统计,目前在我国有数十万的绝症患者痛苦万分地躺在医

    院的病床上维持生命.国内一家肿瘤医院曾对800例身患癌症的垂危患者进行调查统

    计,其中因为不堪忍受痛苦,自愿要求死亡者(要求安乐死)占到30%以上.

    这样的事实到底要向我们说明什么呢?人,首先是生存权利的承受者.每一个读法

    律的学生都应当知道,生存是最基本的人身权利.然而,当生存已经不再继续存在

    ,我们还要来要求尊重社会道德,还要来要求伦理纲常,这又何苦呢?病人都已经

    “痛不欲生”,我们却还要来谈其他所谓高尚的东西,这样的行为对于垂危病人来

    说,意味着什么?我们想清楚的告诉在座各位,这样意味着病人要继续痛苦,意味

    着病人要继续受折磨.这样的状况,难道说也只有身临其境的人才能体会到吗?我

    们是活生生的人啊,这样残忍的事情,情何以堪啊!

    再者,从客观方面来说,安乐死减少了社会负担,节约了社会资源的分配.

    现今中国的国情,我们清楚看到,社会虽然在进步,但是,我们与其他国家之间的

    差距却还是如此之大.

    四川成都双流县一名4岁女童患恶性肿瘤濒临死亡,贫穷的家庭无钱让孩子维持生命

    ,几近崩溃的父亲表示:“我想让我的娃儿安乐死.” 在中国实际条件下,苛求一

    个贫困家庭用光家庭的全部费用甚至倾家荡产来维持一个必死儿童不长的寿命,这

    本身就是一种掠夺.确实,没有人可以有为他人选择死亡的权力,没有人可以随便

    地让他人去面对死亡.

    四川省第二人民医院肿瘤医院的医生在接受记者采访时证实:“有些家长看见孩子

    生了绝症,就把孩子扔到路边,指望好心人救他.”在全国各大医院,每年都有为

    数不少的此类事例出现.这些被遗弃的孩子其中一部分会被社会福利机构收养,度

    过自己生命的最后一段时光;但还有相当一部分孩子被遗弃后,因为无人救治而死

    亡.一名患有先天性心脏病和白内障等多种疾病的3个月大的女婴,被父母抱进医院

    要求“安乐死”.虽然很多人都从内心同意让她“安乐死”,但医院仍拒绝了这种

    不合法的要求,而这名女婴的最后结局就是被抛弃.这样的事情在现今发展中国家

    的中国何其寥寥.与其这样子去对待无辜的孩子,还不如让孩子们的生命在正规医

    疗机构体面地终结.

    我们仍旧处于发展中国家的行列,试问在当前中国的国情下,我们还有多少资源可

    以用来做无用功?我们还有多少人力财力来做这种“不了”的情?试想一下,如果

    我们可以把这些资源用在于建设国家,调整社会资源分配的方面,甚至,如果我们

    可以把这些资源花费在医疗事业上,研究对付各种疾病的良药,这样的选择不是更

    为妥当吗?

    我们前面已经谈到,安乐死实施的对象是患上不治之症的绝症患者,实施的前提是

    病人处于极其痛苦的情况下,在病人和其亲友的要求下,经医生认可,用人道方法

    使病人在无痛苦状态中结束生命过程.这也就避免了安乐死是一种随意为他人选择

    死亡的事实的存在.没有人愿意看到自己身边的人这样痛苦地慢慢离开,即便是伦

    理道德,当面对人生苦痛这个最大的难题时,患者无能为力,我们也要眼睁睁看着

    他们受苦吗.我们感受着这种痛苦,我们体会着这个中滋味,在无法选择的情况下

    ,我们选择了安乐死.这不是对生命的藐视,也不是道德的沦丧.反而,这是一种

    在生命面临煎熬和磨难的时候,为我们身边的亲人,为我们爱着的人,选择另一条

    更容易接受的道路.

    因此,我方认为,安乐死是尊重生命的一种方式.

    Zhengfang support euthanasia : Ladies and gentlemen, good evening.I

    think we all know that survival is a matter of dignity and ethics,

    and no one will be easy to choose to die,However, no one was

    willing to take the "Unbearable Lightness of life."Our view :

    euthanasia is a form of respect for life."Euthanasia" is a term

    that derives from a Greek word meaning "happy" death.It has two

    meanings : First, no painful death; Second, painless death; In

    China the definition of euthanasia :The patients in critical

    condition suffering from an incurable illness, because of the

    extreme mental and physical suffering of patients and their

    relatives in the request.medically approved method employing Road

    patients to end their lives in a state without suffering; First,

    from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients

    themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek

    advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, "I am

    going to look painful, I had to go far from happy."When a person is

    under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very

    existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the

    moral and ethical?The basic survival of the "length" are not able

    to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still

    have to take into account the weight of ethics?Dr. Xu Jing and the

    School of Law of Beijing University, believes that the

    "constitution" stipulates that citizens from infringement of

    personal liberty and human dignity.a specific meaning.The survival

    of individual citizens the right to choose, under certain

    conditions have the right to choose the manner of

    death."Euthanasia" is a special case, not contrary to,community and

    the interests of others under action taken by a special way of

    life.This action is in strict conditions and procedures.Taiwan said

    euthanasia is not free to choose death, but according to Dr. Xu's

    theory,strictly in accordance with the conditions and procedures to

    implement things.November 1, 1999, in patients with advanced

    hepatocellular carcinoma who Guizhou distributed publicly disclosed

    his thinking :"Who can help me achieve euthanasia? "According to

    incomplete statistics,At present, hundreds of thousands of

    terminally ill patients in great pain lying in hospital beds

    life.One domestic Cancer Hospital had 800 cases of critically ill

    patients suffering from cancer survey,because of unbearable pain,

    death voluntary request (ask for euthanasia) accounted for more

    than 30%.We would like to note the fact that in the end what?, The

    right to life is enduring.Every law students should know that

    survival is the most fundamental personal rights.However, when

    survival is no longer continue to exist, we have to demand respect

    for social ethics, but also to demand ethical known philosophical

    systems.But why?Patients have "pain can be excruciating," and we

    still have to talk about other so-called high-class stuff.For

    critically ill patients, such acts, what does it mean?We would like

    to tell you, this means that patients have to go on suffering means

    that the patient must continue to be subject to torture.In such a

    situation, can we say that they are the only people who can

    understand that?We are real people ah, cruel things that struck!

    Furthermore, from an objective point of view, euthanasia reduce the

    burden on society, the distribution of social resources

    conservation.China's present situation, we can clearly see that

    society is in progress, butthe gap between us and other countries

    is just so great.Sichuan Chengdu Shuangliu County, a 4-year-old

    girl suffering from cancer dying, children of poor families money

    to sustain their lives.verge of collapse father said : "I want my

    ten euthanasia. "China's actual conditions,expect a poor family

    used up the full cost of fighting the family to kill the children

    to maintain a long lifeThis, in itself, is a predatory.Indeed, no

    one can promising people the power to choose to die, no one can

    easily let the others face death.Sichuan People's Hospital, the

    second tumor doctors at the hospital, confirmed in an interview

    :"Some parents see the ill child was born, so the child was thrown

    into the roadside, goodhearted people expect to save him. "All of

    the country's hospitals.Every year, there are many such

    examples.These will be part of the abandoned children living in

    institutions of social welfare, spent their lives in the final

    period of their lives;However, a significant number of children

    have been abandoned, because no one where he died.With a variety of

    congenital heart diseases such as cataract and three-month-old

    baby.Parents have been admitted to a hospital to "euthanasia."While

    many people have agreed to let her from the bottom of "euthanasia",

    but the hospital refused this legal requirements,This is the final

    outcome of a baby being abandoned.Such a thing in a developing

    country, China is now how far.Instead of treating innocent children

    like this, would not allow their children to the end of a decent

    life in the formal sector.We still developing inhe ranks, how in

    the current situation,Wuyonggong be used for the amount of

    resources we have?How much money and manpower we do "not"

    intelligence?Let us imagine, if we can use the resources to build

    national, adjust the distribution of social resources and even,If

    we can integrate these resources spent on medical care, to deal

    with the disease's minds.This option is not more appropriate?We

    have already mentioned that the targeted euthanasia of patients

    suffering from incurable diseases.The precondition is that patients

    in very painful conditions, at the request of the patients and

    their relatives, doctors recognizedRoad method employing state of

    the patients at the end of life, pain-free process.This would avoid

    the arbitrary euthanasia is a fact of the existence choose to die

    for others.Nobody likes to see the people around them so painfully

    slowly leave, even if it is ethical.When the biggest problem facing

    life in pain, patients do, we have watched them suffer?.We feel

    this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in

    the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt

    for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the

    lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the

    people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore,

    we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.

    然而,不幸的是,人们不得不面对这样的事实:不管投入多少资源来设法推延死亡

    和减少产生痛苦及残疾的风险,仍然有无数患有不治之症的患者实际上并不能避免

    死亡,反而遭受着极其痛苦而难以忍受的延长死亡过程的医学干预.全世界每年大

    约有五千万人走向死亡,其中相当一部分是被拖延了的死亡.据不完全统计,目前

    在我国有数十万的绝症患者痛苦万分地躺在医院的病床上维持生命.国内一家肿瘤

    医院曾对800例身患癌症的垂危患者进行调查统计,其中因为不堪忍受痛苦,自愿要

    求死亡者(要求安乐死)占到30%以上.经验资料研究表明,在我国的医学实践中

    ,一方面在有条件的大医院同样存在着用昂贵的代价来维持脑死亡患者的"生命"的

    现象(常常可见诸于报端),另一方面,在对无法忍受痛苦的绝症患者的医疗处理

    过程中,安乐死以隐秘或公开方式已经进行以久 .

    Unfortunately, however, is that people have to face the facts :No

    matter how many resources to try to delay death and reduce the risk

    of suffering and disability.In fact there are still countless

    terminally ill patients and can avoid deathInstead, the extension

    of intolerable suffering and death is extremely painful process of

    the medical intervention.Every year some 50 million people around

    the world to death, which was delayed for a considerable number of

    deaths.According to incomplete statistics, there are hundreds of

    thousands of terminally ill patients in great pain lying in

    hospital beds life.One domestic Cancer Hospital had 800 cases of

    critically ill patients suffering from cancer survey,because of

    unbearable pain, death voluntary request (ask for euthanasia)

    accounted for more than 30%.Research and experience shows that the

    medical practice in our country,one of the major hospitals in the

    same conditions exist in the use of brain-dead patients to maintain

    a high price for the "life" of (often found in the newspaper)the

    other hand, the unbearable suffering of the terminally ill patients

    in the medical treatment process,Euthanasia or to open the way for

    a long time hidden.

    类似问题2:英语辩论赛主持人台词 题目是《安乐死是否应该合法化》英语辩论赛主持人台词 题目是安乐死是否应该合法化[语文科目]

    安乐死源于希腊文,原意是“快乐的死亡”或“尊严的死亡”.英文解释为:无痛苦处死患不治之症而又非常痛苦者和非常衰老者.而中国学者们给安乐死下的定义则是:患不治之症的病人在危重濒死状态时,由于精神和躯体的极端痛苦,在病人或家属的要求下,经过医生的认可用人为的方法使病人在无痛苦状态下度过死亡阶段而终结生命全过程.应当说,从上个世纪30年代以来,关于“安乐死是否应该合法化”的争论,在全世界就从来没有停止过.可是到目前为止,也只有荷兰、比利时等少数几个国家,在国家的法律上完全承认了安乐死的合法化……

    类似问题3:安乐死的辩论材料谁有,我18号要,比较急,不要复制别人的!

    我晕,这是正确的啊,为什么不要?

    这种题目本来就要是在网上找的嘛,不过帮你多归纳而已.

    类似问题4:安乐死的辩论词能发给我下吗?

    1不是因为痛苦死亡——因为经济、社会原因而选择死亡.应先做好医保···

    相信人不会轻易放弃自己的生命(这话听着很搞);

    \x05 问对方的政府作为么?①作为.有多少成效?仍旧痛苦的人怎么办?②不作为.癌晚病人仍旧痛苦,安详地死去相对来说是一种比较人道的选择.

    2抑郁症.病人做出的选择不是理智的

    \x05 在疼痛的条件下,抑郁症的检测标准不存在,他们的抑郁是正常的

    3疼痛检测标准

    \x05 我们计划内没有

    4为什么一定要疼痛?(艾滋)

    问候在场各位:

    \x05今天,我方的观点是中国大陆应该安乐死合法.

    \x05我方定义安乐死为:癌症晚期,忍受极度痛苦的人,在自愿的前提下,经医务人员帮助,无痛苦结束生命的行为.

    \x05同时,根据卫生部的调查数据显示,最近30年来,中国的癌症发病呈现明显上升的趋势,可见安乐死的需求将逐年增加.

    \x05过去,根据希波克拉底誓词,我们认为医生的职责应该是救死扶伤.所以,医生不该以任何理由,以直接或间接的方式杀死病人.我方承认,这确实能使医生更加投入地救治病人.但是,根据《我国第三次全国死因调查报告》显示,我国每年有300万患者患癌症,其中,有18%的病人是胰腺癌、大肠癌、肝癌、肺癌的骨转移、肝转移、脑转移等癌症晚期,在上述情况下,病人都会遭受难以忍受的痛苦.发表在《中国肿瘤临床》等多种期刊的文献表明,中国癌症病人中有51%至62%的人伴有不同程度的疼痛,其中30%为重度疼痛.在目前的医疗情况下,即使是最好的镇痛剂,如吗啡,也只能缓解约80%的癌症患者的疼痛,而还有20%的患者无法使用镇痛剂来缓解疼痛.换而言之,在我国约有2万人在临近死亡的情况下,无法依靠药物来缓解难以忍受的肉体疼痛.

    \x05也就是说,在现状之下,一部分癌晚病人的痛苦无法用现有的医疗手段解除,医生即使竭尽全力,也已经无法救治他们.对于他们来说,今后的生活的重心成了忍受痛苦.如果他们想要摆脱这种状态,只能迎接死亡.但现状是什么?现状是医生可以通过死亡的方式帮他们解除痛苦,却因为而现有法律的禁止而爱莫能助.

    \x05在座各位大多身体健康,没有体味过一个癌症晚期的病人的痛苦.他们的胸腔内,恶性积液会占胸腔积液的1/4,他们的脊椎会被癌细胞侵蚀,浑身的负担就压在一块肉上,你们能想像自己全身的重量就压在一块坏死的肉上么?当面对这样一个被判定剩下的日子都将在极度的痛苦中度过的人,我们还能理所应当地阻止医生去帮助他们解除痛苦么?

    \x05可是,1986年,医生蒲连升应要求,为患者实施了安乐死,后被检察院以涉嫌“故意杀人罪”批准逮捕;2009年,何龙成成全老伴徐桂琴的意愿,实行了“安乐死”,被判处有期徒刑三年.

    \x05所以,如今安乐死合法已经成为一件政府迫切需要完成的事情.

    \x05我方主张,在《刑法》解释中增加修补,将医生协助安乐死行为加入免责范围.如果医生可以向法院呈献一下证据,可以被判为无罪:

    \x051、 至少2份三级甲等医院主治医师的证明,证明死者确实是癌症晚期;

    \x052、 一份病人同意书,表明其自愿实行安乐死;

    \x053、 一份精神医生的病人精神状况正常的鉴定与病人家属的确认;

    \x054、 2个以上无利害关系人作证病人是无痛苦死亡的.

    \x05如若不能给出证明,能以谋杀罪论处.

    \x05医生的天职固然是救死扶伤,但在医学无用的情况下,医生同样有义务帮助病人解除痛苦.我们不能因为这种方法是死亡而拒绝去面对他.

    \x05所以,我方认为,中国大陆应该立法安乐死.

    类似问题5:英语辩论赛,安乐死是否合法化我是反方,安乐死不应该合法化,求四辩的总结发言,英文的[英语科目]

    给您一点参考资料:Those who are against euthanasia state that euthanasia is morally andethically wrong, but this is not the end of the argument. The argument alsoincludes that euthanasia is not necess...

  •   4
  • 相关文章

    专利代理人资格考试
    初级经济师考试
    执业医师考试
    教师资格证考试
    同等学力申硕考试
    AP考试
    CCIE考试
    营养师考试
    bec考试
    gre
Copyright ©2009-2021 逆火网训All Rights Reserved.     滇ICP备2023009294号-57