亚瑟王电影的英文评价简短的英文评价-亚瑟王 电影-英
编辑： admin 2017-04-03
-
4
杩欐槸銆婅姖鍔犲摜鏃舵姤銆嬭憲鍚嶅奖璇勪汉Roger Ebert鐨勮瘎璁猴細
For centuries,countless tales have been told of the legend of King Arthur.But the only story you've never heard ...is the true story that inspired the legend.-- Trailer for "King Arthur"
Uh,huh.And in the true story,Arthur traveled to Rome,became a Christian and a soldier,and was assigned to lead a group of yurt-dwelling warriors from Sarmatia on a 15-year tour of duty in England,where Guinevere is a fierce woman warrior of the Woads.His knights team up with the Woads to battle the Saxons.In this version,Guinevere and Lancelot are not lovers,although they exchange significant glances; Arthur is Guinevere's lover.So much for all those legends we learned from Thomas Malory's immortal Le Morte d'Arthur (1470) and the less immortal "Knights of the Round Table" (1953).
This new "King Arthur" tells a story with uncanny parallels to current events in Iraq.The imperialists from Rome enter England intent on overthrowing the tyrannical Saxons,and find allies in the brave Woads."You -- all of you -- were free from your first breath!" Arthur informs his charges and future subjects,anticipating by a millennium or so the notion that all men are born free,and overlooking the detail that his knights have been pressed into involuntary servitude.Later he comes across a Roman torture chamber,although with Geneva and its Convention safely in the future,he doesn鈥檛 believe that Romans do not do such things.
The movie is darker and the weather chillier than in the usual Arthurian movie.There is a round table,but the knights scarcely find time to sit down at it.Guinevere is not a damsel in potential distress,but seems to have been cloned from Brigitte Nielsen in "Red Sonja." And everybody speaks idiomatic English -- even the knights,who as natives of Sarmatia might be expected to converse in an early version of Uzbek,and the Woads,whose accents get a free pass because not even the Oxford English Dictionary has heard of a Woad.To the line "Last night was a mistake" in "Troy," we can now add,in our anthology of unlikely statements in history,Lancelot's line to Guinevere as seven warriors prepare to do battle on a frozen lake with hundreds if not thousands of Saxons:"There are a lot of lonely men over there." (Her reply:"Don't worry.I won't let them rape you," also seems somewhat non-historical.)
Despite these objections,"King Arthur" is not a bad movie,although it could have been better.It isn't flat-out silly like "Troy," its actors look at home as their characters,and director Antoine Fuqua curtails the use of computer effects in the battle scenes,which involve mostly real people.There is a sense of place here,and although the costumes bespeak a thriving trade in tailoring somewhere beyond the mead,the film's locations look rough,ready and green (it was filmed in Ireland).
Clive Owen,who has been on the edge of stardom for a decade,makes an Arthur who seems more like a drill instructor,less like a fairy-tale prince,than most of the Arthurs we've seen.Lean,dark and angular,he takes the character to the edge of anti-hero status.Keira Knightley,who was the best friend in "Bend It Like Beckham," here looks simultaneously sexy and muddy,which is a necessity in this movie,and fits right into the current appetite for women action heroes who are essentially honorary men,all except for the squishy parts.The cast is filled with dependable actors with great faces,such as Ray Winstone as a tough-as-nails knight who inexplicably but perhaps appropriately anticipates the Cockney accent,and Stephen Dillane as Merlin,leader of the Woads and more of a psychic and sorcerer than a magician who does David Copperfield material.
The plot involves Rome's desire to defend its English colony against the invading Saxons,and its decision to back the local Woads in their long struggle against the barbarians.But Rome,declining and falling right on schedule,is losing its territorial ambitions and beginning to withdraw from the far corners of its empire.That leaves Arthur risking his neck without much support from the folks at home,and perhaps he will cast his lot with England.In the traditional legends he became king at 15,and went on to conquer Scotland,Ireland,Iceland -- and Orkney,which was flattered to find itself in such company.
The movie ends with a pitched battle that's heavy on swords and maces and stabbings and skewerings,and in which countless enemies fall while nobody that we know ever dies except for those whose deaths are prefigured by prescient dialogue or the requirements of fate.I have at this point seen about enough swashbuckling,I think,although producer Jerry Bruckheimer hasn't,since this project follows right on the heels of his "Pirates of the Caribbean." I would have liked to see deeper characterizations and more complex dialogue,as in movies like "Braveheart" or "Rob Roy," but today's multiplex audience,once it has digested a word like Sarmatia,feels its day's work is done.
That the movie works is because of the considerable production qualities and the charisma of the actors,who bring more interest to the characters than they deserve.There is a kind of direct,unadorned conviction to the acting of Clive Owen and the others; raised on Shakespeare,trained for swordfights,with an idea of Arthurian legend in their heads since childhood,they don't seem out of time and place like the cast of "Troy." They get on with it.
类似问题
类似问题1：请问有关亚瑟王的英文评论吗[英语科目]
King Arthur is an important figure in the mythology of Great Britain,where he appears as the ideal of kingship both in war and peace.Legends portray him as the greatest king Britain,or the world,would ever have--the "Once and Future King"--and even today he was ranked as one of the 100 Greatest Britons of all times.He is the central character in the cycle of legends known as the Matter of Britain,which portrays him as a leader of the Sub-Roman Britons during the Saxon invasions of the 5th and 6th centuries.Originally celebrated as a culture hero by the Brythonic peoples,by the 12th century his fame had spread to the Briton's relatives in Brittany,and from there to France,Anglo-Norman England,and the rest of Europe.King Arthur remains a household name throughout the Western World today.
There is disagreement about whether he,or a model for him,ever actually existed,or whether he is a mythic figure who has been given a historicised setting.[1] His title of 'King' is disputed:in the earliest mentions and in Welsh texts,he is never given the title 'King'.An early text refers to him as Dux Bellorum ('Duke of Battles'),[2] and medieval Welsh texts often call him ameraudur ("emperor" in the pre-Medieval sense of the Latin imperator,i.e."commander").
慢慢看哈...
类似问题2：亚瑟王英文简介about King Arthur ,thank you最好不要用网络上的翻译工具不要用网络上的翻译工具!ddcaicai你回答得很全 但是我要的不是这么长篇大论的 30秒之内可以说完的长度即可[英语科目]
不好意思~有事耽搁了!是半分钟吧?太短了,很难写哦~
Is Arthur a man or a legend?
Arthur was the first born son of King Uther Pendragon and heir to the throne.But the baby Arthur was raised in a secret place for safety.
Eventurely,he was crowned.He fought everywhere,and he won great victories.
In acient times,he was regarded as High King of Britain.Now he is the hero in my heart,a great man and a legend.
类似问题3：推荐几部关于亚瑟王的电影要好看一点的,最好是亲身体验过的,
如题 亚瑟王 本身就是一部电影 当然比起 勇敢的心 爱国者 他还是不行的 但是单单的 去看电影本身所带来的视觉 冲击 还是可以的
类似问题4：《亚瑟王之剑》的英语评论请问哪位看到过有关《亚瑟王之剑》这本书的英语评论呀~有的话能不能提供给小弟一下呀~[英语科目]
The Sword of King Arthur 或 Excalibur
类似问题5：关于亚瑟王电影
《The mists of Avalon》（《亚瑟王传奇》/《阿瓦隆迷雾》）
不是今年那部票房惨淡的《King Arthur》（《亚瑟王》）,而时2001年,根据魔幻小说家Marion Zimmer Bradley1982年的同名小说改编的迷你剧集.是属于目前为止,我所见到的对有关亚瑟王传奇及其人物体系交待最为丰富和完整的影视作品了.亚瑟、桂妮蔚、兰斯洛特、梅林、湖中夫人等等人物都有出现,并且如蟠龙在梅林协助下幽会伊格琳生下压瑟、亚瑟和姐姐摩根乱伦、兰斯洛特和湖中夫人的关系、毛德列轼父等平时罕见有出现的情节也一一交待,算是让我这个准亚瑟迷过了些瘾头.
相比今年出品的《亚瑟王》,这部《阿瓦隆迷雾》的气质要阴柔迷离的多,虽然也有些战场厮杀血肉横飞的镜头,但重点却决非于亚瑟大一统的征战过程.所有的男性角色都隐藏在了女性背后,亚瑟和兰斯洛特因为搭着桂尼蔚的关系,还稍多一些镜头,其他的圆桌骑士,统统成了只会在餐桌上大块朵颐的食客.
其实这从片名《the mists of Avalon》已经可以了解,为什么不是《the mists of Camelot》?Camelot（卡米洛城）是亚瑟统一不列颠建立丰功伟业的城堡,而Avalon则是传说中亚瑟和毛德列决战后,灵魂归处的神秘岛屿.
[b]“岸边,月光里驶来一艘披着黑纱的帆船；船上清一色黑衣女子,为首三人头戴凤冠,啼哭不止.亚瑟命伯畏将自己背上船放下,三女王迎上前来,其中个头高高,面目皎洁的那位将国王的脑袋靠在自己怀里,称他兄弟.”[/b]
Marion Zimmer Bradley大概就是从“三女王接归亚瑟”中得到了灵感,干脆就以在传说中“云霞明灭或可睹”的阿瓦隆岛为源,把大不列颠王荡气回肠的征战史写成一段亦真亦幻的传奇.
阿瓦隆,隐藏在大雾弥漫的湖中,她是湖中夫人的居所,是女神的圣地.当基督教在大不列颠岛如火如荼的遍布开的时候,当从前崇拜the Godness（女神）的人民纷纷投向the God（上帝）的时候,湖中夫人的担忧、焦虑一天天的增加.为了维护女神的地位,她和梅林策划了蟠龙王和伊格林的邂逅,带走亚瑟同母异父的姐姐摩根教授其法术,协助亚瑟取得“削钢剑”,设计亚瑟和姐姐摩根乱伦生下毛德列……湖中夫人倾其一生乃至性命,皆是为了能让“女神”信仰在人世间永驻,能让传承了Avalon血液的亚瑟和摩根在中土的势力壮大,能让Avalon的尊严在世间永远歌颂.
这是一场古老神祗在新文明到临前争取生存的斗争,是新旧两个时代交锋的一场迷雾.显然其中隐隐象征/比喻着母系氏族的没落（但是如果按照年份来考,又不足信）,或者更加确切的说,是人类在历经了自然原始力量的崇拜后,随着对力量和未知越来越多的的掌控,开始摈弃野性的力量,崇尚文明的一番历程.
亚瑟在之前的诸多艺术作品中,一直是以一个虔诚的基督徒形象出现,甚至有了发动圆桌骑士寻找圣杯的行为.而在片中,他继承着纯正阿瓦隆血统,但却娶了信仰基督教的桂尼蔚,他是一个试图在女神和上帝中寻找平衡的王,但这种结合原本就脆弱,甚至连他自己都无法同时对两个神保持相等的爱和信仰!而女神祭祀的继承者摩根得知自己中计和亚瑟结合,羞愧愤怒地和阿瓦隆/湖中夫人斩断关系.这是湖中夫人始料未及的结果,孤注一掷的她,去依靠毛德列,却不知道他早已在养母的教唆下背弃了阿瓦隆的真义.
父子俩在战场上的厮杀毁灭了阿瓦隆最后的继承人,当上帝的子民越来越多,也就意味着阿瓦隆的魔力在人世间越来模糊.阿瓦隆不可避免的消失在了茫茫的白雾中.
阿瓦隆的衰灭是片子的主线,穿插其中的,才是亚瑟王和他的骑士们：兰斯洛特的骑士之爱,毛德列的大逆不道,卡米洛城,圆桌,战争……
这还是不是原汁原味的亚瑟王?或许,像克里夫·欧文那样浴血疆场的才是更加贴近历史的真实（《亚瑟王》）；或许,像肖恩·康纳利那样庄严凛然才是“永远的王”（《第一骑士》）；或许……
谁知道呢,谁又曾知道呢?The mists of Avalon!