求：人工智能的英文影评-人工智能电影观后感-英语学习
编辑： admin 2017-01-03
-
4
I saw A.I.on the first night it ran here and I must say I was disappointed in the size of the audience.How strange to see so few people show up for a Spielberg film.This film did not enjoy the normal hype that most of Spielberg's films enjoy,I think I know why.Lack of product placement.They're may have been some somewhere but I didn't see them.A.I.'s story line and flawless visual effects reflect what I can only describe as the meeting of two great film makers.Kubrick (who started work on the project after he read the Aldiss book in '83),and Steven Spielberg who's long list of intelligent blockbusters made him the perfect person to bring this story to the screen.I could,I believe see the story boards and concepts Kubrick developed and I could also see the sensitivity that Spielberg added to scenes and characters.These two things are not entirely separate in good Science Fiction.All good science fiction has some human sensitivity in it otherwise it would just be a horror film.The script reflects some of the darkness and coldness that sometimes underlies each character human and machine,there is no fear of this in the story.This darkness draws us on in the story.
The visual effects are stunning and come darn close to genius.The story line takes us in and the visuals make it almost real.
A.I.Is a good union of two great film makers.,1 July 2001
Author:John R.Armstrong (Jafredderf@aol.com) from Chicago
I wish I had Mr.Mannings grip of syntax,but all in all at the end of the day it's good science fiction and a good story too.I beleve that Stanley Kubrick's choice of asking Steven Spielberg to make this film was the kind of genius that Kubrick showed in all his work.It is a tribute to both men that they saw a vision of something and worked toward it's creation.I think they came to a great place in film making.
Future classic...,26 September 2001
Author:Chris Harrison (secombe82@aol.com) from Wiltshire,England
First of all,once again I think the critics have got it wrong.Like Blade Runner and 2001,this is a film that will be properly judged in 10/20 years or maybe more.Its way ahead of its time,the combination of Kubrick and Spielberg is unique,its unlikely we will ever see anything like this again.
Did I like it?The answer would have to be yes,the mix of styles will put many people off,but I found it to be unlike anything I have ever seen,and all the better for it.The story is by no means original but everything else about the film is so different that this can be forgiven.To get one thing straight,Kubrick decided Spielberg would be the better man for directing it,and I think this was a very wise decision,many of the ideas are pure Kubrick,but Spielberg has the neccassary attributes to direct such a film,and great credit has to go to Kubrick for handing it to him.
Haley Joel Osment is amazing,the robot/human emotion must be amazingly difficult to pull off effectively,but Osment does it with such relative ease to the point where you do believe he is a robot,not that he is just acting as a robot.Jude Law is excellent,and so to is Frances O'Conner.
As for the ending,as brave as an idea it may of been to end on a downbeat note at "the first ending" I think the slightly upbeat ending is much more appropriate.
All in all I would say A.I is a wonderfully unique film that should be judged for what it is,a film.Forget everything about the Spielberg/Kubrick "issue" and just sit back and take in a truely amazing film.You may hate it,you may love it,but no matter what,it will effect your emotions in some way and you will discuss the film afterwards.
This film will be truely judged in 20 years or so,when it can be assessed purely as a film,as with 'Blade Runner','2001',and even 'The Thing',it will get better with age.
A.I.--A Film With Heart And Brains,6 July 2001
Author:virek213 from San Gabriel,Ca.,USA
Steven Spielberg's latest movie A.I.:ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,which he took up at the encouragement of the late,great Stanley Kubrick,has caused widely divergent comments.And I can't help wondering if the most scathingly negative reviews of this movie aren't just an open desire to see Spielberg crash,as he had with "1941" and HOOK.
For my money,Spielberg has done it again with this futuristic science fiction drama,regardless of what the negative reviews say.Its story of a robot boy (Haley Joel Osment) who desires to be a real boy in a far future in which humans (Orgas) and machines (Mechas) exist side-by-side but not always in harmony is very much modeled on the Pinocchio story,though it is actually based on a 1969 short story by Brian Aldiss.It raises some interesting and sometimes unsettling moral dilemmas that few films of late have done.Can a parent love a child,even if that child is not real?What might happen if that child desired to be real?How will Man and Machine be able to co-exist?
Like all intelligent science fiction,such as Kubrick's own 2001:A SPACE ODYSSEY and Spielberg's own CLOSE ENCOUNTERS,A.I.forces us to ponder where we've been and where we might be going.It's an incredible combination of Kubrick's icy intellectual and clinical mind and Spielberg's emotional heart; and I think it works exceedingly well.But it forces the viewer to not leave their heart and brains at the door,which I think is why it is being so negatively received in this season of mindless summer movie fare.It may be too intelligent for its own good,and many don't have the 145 minutes of patience needed for the movie.I did,however; and I would call this an absolute masterpiece.Out of ten stars,give this one a 10.
A mind-blowing movie that will grow in stature,6 March 2002
Wow!That was all I could say when I walked out of the theatre after my first helping of A.I.I wasn't sure whether I loved the movie or was disappointed by it,I just knew it had had a huge effect on me.Having seen it a further three times at the cinema,I still find fault with it,but I keep returning to it,thinking about it,discussing it,and it has left me with a feeling that,five months later,I've still not shaked.In many regards,this movie reminds me of Fight Club,not in terms of theme or emotional content,but due to it's level of craft,the daring nature of it's execution and the fact that I keep re-evaluating it.All the things that are possible to comment objectively on (if anything ever is) are handled expertly.The performances are top-notch,especially Haley Joel Osment as David,the little robot child that longs to be human.The effects are not only very impressive,but are integrated into the story rather than calling attention to themselves.Januz Kaminski's photography is,as one has come to expect,impressive,and the movie is unusually unpredictable for such a big-budget experience.
In my opinion,John Williams' score is among his most impressive.I listened to it on CD for three weeks before seeing the movie,and thought it was fantastic,but once the movie started rolling I completely forgot about the music.That says a lot about both the score and the film itself.I also liked the three-act structure,in which the tone and feel of the movie changes drastically as the story progresses.Part one,as one reviewer noted,feels like a cross between E.T.and The Shining,an odd,but very effective combination.The second part of the movie is awash with Spielbergian imagery,but with the darkness and coldness of a Kubrick movie.And the last part is a head-scratcher that has the intellectual resonance of most Kubrick-films,and the emotional tone of something like Cinema Paradiso.I purposely refrain from saying that it is as emotional as Spielberg-films,because I think the director's complexities,the dark aspects of his style,and the occasional subtleties of his work are often overlooked by critics.
It's difficult to discuss the themes of the movie without spoiling it,but while many people criticised the movie from having several false endings,I felt that each continuation added layers of though and complexities that the movie would have lacked had it ended sooner.I have come to the conclusion,over the past months,that I do love the movie and that it is my favourite film of 2001,even ahead of The Fellowship of The Ring and Amelie.In other words,buy it on DVD,it's more than worth it.
All of the above from IMDB.
类似问题
类似问题1：人工智能英语的 影评字数大约150字顺便翻译一下 有些生词我不懂?[英语科目]
The movie provides an example of failing to draw an audience into a story,and an example of story structure that takes away from a story.
AI is about the question,"What makes us human?" Can a robot (computer intelligence) ever be human?The boy robot David is created to be fully capable of human characteristics,even love.But he is quickly rejected by his family,and the rest of the story is about his quest to become human so he can regain his mother's acceptance and love.
The first twenty minutes of a film,the opening,are critical for engaging the audience.This story has an intriguing story line,great settings,nice special effects,and enough motivation and emotion in the opening,so why doesn't it emotionally engage the audience?Because we don't identify with the struggles of the people involved since there is no continuity of any single character's story.
类似问题2：人工智能的英文影评 一定要短一点的![英语科目]
I thought A.I.was a very good film.I'm sure it is somewhat different from what Kubrick had thought but he and Spielberg had worked on it for a long time.I liked the questions that it posed about such as what does it mean to be a being?Does the boy robot have genuine feelings or are they programmed?But we as people do we have genuine feelings or are they "programmed" in our genetic code,by society,and by other factors?Intriguing questions from an intriguing film.Definitely a thinking persons movie.The acting by Haley Joel Osmet was outstanding and the supporting cast was equally good,too.The portrayal of the future was somewhat frightening but also extremely fascinating.Especially the ending of the film.I saw this film with my brother who's first word when the film ended was "Wow!" He only expresses that for films he really likes.Those who like science fiction and those who like films that make them think definitely see this film.Even if you are not as impressed as I am you will find parts of the film fascinating.
类似问题3：英语翻译"Rememuer"应该改为"Remember"吧?还有,两周后的今天是你生日吧?你的丫头会祝福你的,那我现在提前祝福咯!生日快乐![英语科目]
I think the word "rememuer" must be change "remember"? Furthermore, i think two weeks later is your birthday? Wish you happy forever! Now i send my wishes for you. happy birthday!
希望能帮到你
类似问题4：我想要电影人工智能的观后感,
为《AI》写点什么,很早以前就想过,不是要突增悲哀,只是有些东西,看过便不能忘记.一如“他的爱是真的,然而,他不是”.
初涉
南北极冰融化,海水淹没城市,气候变幻莫测,饥荒肆虐蔓延……一个正在崩塌的家园,末日一样的未来.这里,人们越来越依赖于科技,以及自己最杰出的产品——人工智能,它的影子遍及生活的每个角落,从身体发肤到衣食住行,也许,还将到那不可被替代的情感.科学家们在争论不休,新的Robot将应运而生,他们“超越简单的情感模拟器”,他们将记忆痛学习爱甚至会做梦,他们的感情将永恒不变,而人类,“能对这份爱付出相等的回应吗”?
Monica,孤单而悲伤的母亲,不能面对儿子Martin因绝症躺在冷冻箱里将渐渐死去事实,陷于情感崩溃的边缘.David,11岁,身高4尺6英寸,金发的机器男孩,他的到来是为了抚平年轻母亲的伤痛.小小身影逆光走进Monica的家门,迈下第一步台阶,翘起脚尖轻轻敲着地板,然后转过身说“I like your floor”,一个有双清澄蓝眼睛的小男孩冲她坦诚地微笑.惊惧,Monica无法接受这种情感的替代,却为一个如此真实的孩子而疑惑,丈夫Henry说“A made child”,“这是一次普通的免费使用,一个极好的向公司表现的机会”.理智与感情的矛盾,也许在那一刻已注定了David在这个家庭里的最终命运.
爱的体验
孩子,爱也盼被爱的孩子,人工智能赋予David不可变更的身份.“登陆注册之后,机器小孩的爱将被密封储存,永远成为他的的一部分,……即使被收养的父母遗弃,亦不再出售”,唯一的结局是销毁,爱的前提是残酷.
David对世界最初体验的源于好奇,照片里的另一个男孩是谁?Monica早晨喝的黑色液体是什么?被关到壁橱里是一个游戏吗?然后开始模仿,找出卫生间里的Monica,以为这也是捉迷藏；一本一眼地学父母餐桌上的动作,再因Monica嘴角的面条大笑.这是他最简单的情感表达,同初生宝宝的第一次微笑一样,将消逝已久的快乐再次带回了Monica与Henry身边.从开始的拒绝、排斥,到隔着雕花玻璃门的观察,再到愿意哄这个永远睡不着的孩子入睡,Monica的理智在瓦解,她只知道她需要这个孩子,而David单纯眼睛里,看不见的是,在Monica心底儿子Martin那沉睡的脸.
清晨的阳光里,七道程序启动的指令,一声“Mommy”来得毫无防备,David蜷入Monica的怀中,她的爱从此由他来承担,而他新的人生是否真正能走进她的世界?如果故事就此打住,可能平淡却会很幸福,但那不是导演的本意,快乐易逝,悲哀却总难遗忘,也许意义的深刻才会由此而生.
寻找梦想
去舞会之前,Monica对David的关心让Henry提醒她说“It’s a toy”.David调皮打翻了Monica的香水,看着空空的香水瓶,此时Monica才开始重新思考David在她心中的位置.
“妈妈,你会死吗?”
“有一天会.”
“那我会孤单.……你会活多久呢?”
“50年吧.”
“我希望你永远不要死……”
Monica取出了Teddy——机器小熊,“Teddy是一件超级玩具,相信你们可以好好相互照顾.”无尽的爱对有限的有机生命太过沉重,还是交付给相同机械体吧.Teddy抗议说“我不是玩具”,可David听不到,他只疑惑50年究竟是一段多长的时间.
Martin病愈归来,序曲结束,Monica说“世界上最好的事发生了”,而David的悲剧才刚刚拉开帷幕.疑虑,“你的生日是哪一天?”“什么是你第一个记得的?”Martin的问题突如其来,不断强调David不是真的小孩.嫉妒,与Martin比吃菠菜,半夜偷剪母亲的头发,在她讲给Martin的睡前故事里露出笑容,只因为他如此渴望母亲的爱,而成为real boy是他唯一心愿.故障维修时,David对握住他手的Monica说“妈妈,我不痛”；面对愤怒的Henry说“我只是想让妈妈爱我更多”.而Monica开始心慌,她的爱在动摇,即使她不断说服自己“这只是普通男孩间的挑战,他只是在游戏中犯了错误”,但面对Henry的“他不是人类,……他被制造用来爱人,而这也能解读他的恨”,她无力反驳.
Martin的生日会上,David终于犯下不可挽回的错误.害怕,与希望得到保护,让他抱着Martin跌入泳池.人们救起Martin,却将David遗忘在池底,从蓝眼睛里看池水外的世界,不知道他能否明白,其实那里他从没有真正走入.Monica为David无法预知的行为感到恐惧,人类情感的复杂,让她无从判断机器孩子最简单的心愿,“Dear mommy, I love you and Henry, and the sun is shinning, ……I’m your little boy, and so is Martin but not Teddy.”他其实只想做你真正的小孩,得到你他相同的爱与关怀.
David欢天喜地地踏上了与Monica去“野餐”的旅途,在Monica的眼泪中感到隐隐的不安,然后执着坚持关于被抛弃“Is it a game?”,Monica将David推跌树下,留下的只是嘱咐他“远离人群,与同类一起才会安全”,和一句“Sorry,我没有告诉你关于这个世界”.学会爱却给了悲伤,学会了笑却没有眼泪.母亲为什么离去?是因为不是real child吗?找到将皮诺曹变成人类孩子的蓝仙女,成为真正的小孩,David带着Teddy开始寻找自己的梦想.
自我成长
David遇见的第一群人,应该是机器人,型号过时,功能不全的机器人,在一堆残骸间寻找下颌、断肢、以及眼球,形貌甚是恐怖.然后是机械猎人,黑衣上的荧光令他们在夜间看起来像驾着摩托飞驰的骷髅.然而这些远不及机械屠宰场的可怕,那里人类对机械的仇恨在极致中沸腾,他们因机器人被支离破碎而欢呼,看机器人被腐蚀熔化而疯狂.其实,在这里,人比机器恐怖.因为需要,他们制造机器人,又因为机器人的存在,他们看到自身不足,并为之感到不安,害怕被替代而猜忌,于是将其视作危险的竞争对手,最大限度的与之敌对,成人世界里潜藏的利己主义和残忍暴虐,在电影中,在对机器人的屠杀中,被戏剧化地放大了.
在这群机器人中,David是特殊的,因为之前“从未有人制造机器孩子”,他诞生的意图是特殊的,他有人类孩子的一切特质,并“有人为他倾注了爱心”,难怪疯狂的观众也要为他向屠宰场老板扔出石头,而屠宰场的工作人员也要惊奇说“David,你是独一无二的”.所以,尽管经历了诸多恐惧、无助并眼见了人类对机器人的残酷,David仍执着于自己的梦想,并坚信他的存在是“独特”的,而这种认定也许正是同人类一样对自我存在的肯定.
为找到能实现心愿的蓝仙女,同机器情人Joe一起,David来到了胭脂城,这里夜总会、俱乐部遍布,流光溢彩的城市是Joe诞生舞台.他们找到“万事通”博士,一部信息百科全书,David想知道蓝仙女怎样能把机器人变成真正的小孩,它告诉他们Allen Hobby的书中有这种神奇力量,而童话中的蓝仙女在世界尽头的失落之城——曼哈顿.
影片中的国际都市,曼哈顿,不可避免的陷在无边海水之中,水面残存的断壁残垣述说着人类文明曾有的进步与辉煌.在这里等待David的是他的制造者Allen Hobby,还有,一个一模一样的自己.David的自我信念开始崩溃,演化为要毁灭另一个自己的暴力；进而又遭到Hobby的另一重打击,“……在此之前,机器人不会有梦想,没有自主意识,……你是一个成功的典范,……我的儿子才是唯一的……”；然后发现一片尚未出厂的机器孩子,在原型模板的眼中看见自己人生的最初记忆——工厂的标志.想爱却遭抛弃,寻找梦想只是一个童话,而自己的存在亦不能得到承认,真正的孤独与绝望,“妈妈”,带着来自心底最深的呼唤与渴望,David义无反顾地坠入茫茫汪洋……
Joe被警察带走了,对获救的David说,“有一天当你变成真人,记得向女孩们提起我,我存在,我曾经存在.” 在水下,在蓝仙女的雕像前,David祈祷千年,灯灭冰封,沧海桑田……
记得很久以前,在前往胭脂城的途中,Joe问“蓝仙女是女的,还是男的?”David说“女的.”Joe愉快地说,“我了解女人,……蓝色对人类代表忧郁,而我能令所有女人面红耳赤,……世界上所有的愿望都能实现……”机器人的悲剧早已注定,他们的存在价值只来自需要他们的人对他们承认和肯定,所以,David“上穷碧落下黄泉”所找寻的爱与梦想注定不会有结果,他的心愿只有让异星生命来实现.其实,这也只是导演与观众浪漫的寄情,正如影片中所说：
Come away O human child
To the water and the wild
With a fairy hand in hand,
For the world’s more full of weeping
Than you can understand.
注：影片最后出现的其实并不是异星生命,而是2000年后的机器人.预示着人类已在未来的天灾中消亡,而在冰封的地球上,存活下来的智能“生物”,只有之前被人类仇恨与怀疑的机器人.
类似问题5：人工智能观后感~不看这一部电影会后悔~真的~http://v.youku.com/v_playlist/f1185341o1p0.html 看完以后有什么感想 没有写下~后面那一段我都哭了~真的我怎么没有早一点发现这一部电影~
看看