关于安乐死的一个辩论 求材料急 明天就辩论了-安乐死
编辑： admin 2017-01-03
-
4
现代的安乐死,来源于希腊词euthanasia,这个词有两部份组成：前缀eu-意思是
美好的、善意的、有助的；词根 -thanasia,意思是致死,或使生命结束,二者结
合构成一个新词,译为中文“安乐死”. 作为现代的科学术语,意思是“对无法
治愈的疾病,好意地帮助患者死亡,或使他致死”,没有明确使用什么方法. 从
法律的意义说,对病者采用安乐死的措施,个人无权,必须有法律依据和见证人,
如患者自己的志愿要求,或者家属恳求,或者法制机构的决议.
Modern euthanasia, and whether he considers comes from the Greek
word, the word has two parts :Prefix eu- mean better goodwill and
help. Roots -thanasia mean deathor over, the two will form a new
word, the Chinese translation of "euthanasia."As modern science
jargon, which means "no cure for the disease, sympathetic help
patients died, or his death."not clear what methods were being
used.From the legal significance of the patients using euthanasia,
the right individual must have a legal basis and witnesses.If the
voluntary patients, or family members begged or legal bodies.
(一) 西方现代的思潮,宗教信仰单薄,讨论安乐死话题,都避免宗教伦理,只从社
会意义和生命价值以实用主义分析. 如果一个人失去了生存能力,对社会没有了
贡献,也就失去了生命的意义,减少对别人的倚赖和对社会的负担.
(二) 安乐死可以彻底消除病人的疾病痛苦,精神压力和思想懮愁.
(三) 人总难免一死,早晚都是死；一死百了,死人活人都解脱,患者与亲朋皆大欢
喜.(四) 人的生命属于自己,个人有权结束生命,这是个人自由和独享的人权.
modern Western ideas and religious beliefs of our topic of
discussion of euthanasia, to avoid religious ethics.only social
meaning and value of life in a pragmatic analysis.If a person loses
the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the
meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.
(2) the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful
diseases, mental stress and depression thinking exists.(C) a person
bound to die sooner or later die; One hundred dead, the living dead
are free, patients and relatives reflex happy.(D) the lives of
their own people, individuals have the right to end their lives,
which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.
美国全国民意研究所抽样调查,赞成安乐死的1947年为37％,1973年上升到51％,
1983年为63％,近年则达到了72％.
National Institute of public opinion poll in 1947 to 37% in favor
of euthanasia.51%,1983, rising to 63% in 1973, reached 72% in
recent years.
法律作为一种规范社会的工具,是应顺应社会要求的.二战以来,安乐死合法化
的呼声越来越高.安乐死作为人的权利在世界范围都具有普遍意义,其立法工作也
势在必行.随着时间的推移,安乐死在我国已成为一个新的社会问题,已成为社会
需要的强烈表现.而我国通常认为实施安乐死是一种犯罪,这种“一棒子打死”的
做法已不符合社会需求,因此,在我国制定一部有关安乐死的法律来完善对生命权
保护的法律体系,加大对生命保护的力度,不但具有理论上的可行性,也具有积极
的现实意义.
The law as a tool for social norms that are responsive to community
needs.Since World War II, increasing demands for the legalization
of euthanasia.Euthanasia as the rights are of universal
significance in the world, its legislative work is imperative.With
the passage of time, euthanasia in China has become a new social
problem, has become a strong performance needs of the
community.China, the practice of euthanasia is a crime that often,
"killed a stick" approach that do not conform to the needs of
society.Therefore, in China to enact a law on euthanasia to perfect
the legal system to protect the right to life.intensify efforts to
protect the lives of not only theoretical feasibility are positive
and practical significance.
综上所述,无论在外国还是我国,无论以情理分析,还是以法理分析,安乐死
合法化都是可行的.但是,任何事都不可能一蹴而就,但我们要以积极的态度把“
安乐死”纳入法制轨道.从目前我国整体的经济发展水平,法律建设状况和医疗保
障水准等方面看,现在为安乐死全面立法的确有些不现实,我们不妨报着积极的态
度,为安乐死立法创造条件.比照近些年的“税收”试点（已收到很好效果）我们
可以在我国东部一些经济,科技,文化发达的城市做一些“试点”工作之后,先为
安乐死“打开半扇门”,在人们可以接受的程度内为安乐死部分立法,确定哪些安
乐死可以允许,哪些应当禁止,并随着社会的发展给予其修订与改正,等待我国东
西部经济差距缩小,再把该结果推向全国.
In short, whether in a foreign country or in China, both in
reasonable analysis, or to a legal analysislegalization of
euthanasia are feasible.However, things could not be accomplished
overnight, but we have to adopt a positive attitude "euthanasia"
into the orbit of the legal system.From the current level of
overall economic development, the legal aspects of building
conditions and the standard of medical care,Euthanasia is indeed
unrealistic for comprehensive legislation now, we might think with
a positive attitude,create conditions for euthanasia
legislation.Follow the recent "tax" on a trial basis (received good
results) we can in some eastern economic, technological,Cultural
developed cities do some "experimental" work, the first to sleep,
"half-open door."To the extent that it was acceptable in some
euthanasia legislation can determine which allow euthanasia, which
should be prohibited,With the development of society and its
amendments and corrections, waiting to narrow the economic gap
between east and west China.then the results to the country.
正方：支持安乐死
各位来宾,大家好.
我想大家都知道,生存是一件关乎尊严以及伦理道德的事情,没有人会轻易地去选
择死亡,但是,也没有人愿意去承受“生命不能承受之轻”.我方观点认为：安乐
死是尊重生命的一种方式.
"安乐死"一词源于希腊文,意思是"幸福"的死亡.它包括两层含义,一是无痛苦的
死亡；二是无痛致死术；而在我国对安乐死的定义为：患不治之症的病人在垂危状
态下,由于精神和躯体的极端痛苦,在病人和其亲友的要求下,经医生认可,用人
道方法使病人在无痛苦状态中结束生命过程；
首先,从主观方面来讲,安乐死对于病人自身,是一种减少生命痛苦的方式.
人,总是趋利避害的,没有人会说“我要去寻找痛苦,我要去远离快乐”.当一个
人处于精神和躯体的极端痛苦之下,当生命的存在已成为一场噩梦,我们难道还要
提及道德和伦理吗?生存这个基本的“长度”都已经不能够维持,还要来谈及生命
的宽度,还要去顾及伦理的重量吗?
北京大学法学博士徐景和认为,《宪法》规定公民人身自由与人格尊严不受侵犯,
是有特定含义的.公民个人有权选择生存的方式,在特定条件下也有权选择死亡的
方式.“安乐死”是一种在特殊情况下,在不违背国家、社会和他人利益的情况下
所采取的一种对生命的特殊处分方式,这种处分是有严格的条件与程序的.我方所
说的安乐死,不是随意地去选择死亡,而是按徐博士的理论,依照严格条件和程序
去实施的事情.
1999年11月1日,贵州一位晚期肝癌患者向全社会公开吐露了自己的心声："谁能帮
我实现安乐死?"据不完全统计,目前在我国有数十万的绝症患者痛苦万分地躺在医
院的病床上维持生命.国内一家肿瘤医院曾对800例身患癌症的垂危患者进行调查统
计,其中因为不堪忍受痛苦,自愿要求死亡者（要求安乐死）占到30％以上.
这样的事实到底要向我们说明什么呢?人,首先是生存权利的承受者.每一个读法
律的学生都应当知道,生存是最基本的人身权利.然而,当生存已经不再继续存在
,我们还要来要求尊重社会道德,还要来要求伦理纲常,这又何苦呢?病人都已经
“痛不欲生”,我们却还要来谈其他所谓高尚的东西,这样的行为对于垂危病人来
说,意味着什么?我们想清楚的告诉在座各位,这样意味着病人要继续痛苦,意味
着病人要继续受折磨.这样的状况,难道说也只有身临其境的人才能体会到吗?我
们是活生生的人啊,这样残忍的事情,情何以堪啊!
再者,从客观方面来说,安乐死减少了社会负担,节约了社会资源的分配.
现今中国的国情,我们清楚看到,社会虽然在进步,但是,我们与其他国家之间的
差距却还是如此之大.
四川成都双流县一名4岁女童患恶性肿瘤濒临死亡,贫穷的家庭无钱让孩子维持生命
,几近崩溃的父亲表示：“我想让我的娃儿安乐死.” 在中国实际条件下,苛求一
个贫困家庭用光家庭的全部费用甚至倾家荡产来维持一个必死儿童不长的寿命,这
本身就是一种掠夺.确实,没有人可以有为他人选择死亡的权力,没有人可以随便
地让他人去面对死亡.
四川省第二人民医院肿瘤医院的医生在接受记者采访时证实：“有些家长看见孩子
生了绝症,就把孩子扔到路边,指望好心人救他.”在全国各大医院,每年都有为
数不少的此类事例出现.这些被遗弃的孩子其中一部分会被社会福利机构收养,度
过自己生命的最后一段时光；但还有相当一部分孩子被遗弃后,因为无人救治而死
亡.一名患有先天性心脏病和白内障等多种疾病的3个月大的女婴,被父母抱进医院
要求“安乐死”.虽然很多人都从内心同意让她“安乐死”,但医院仍拒绝了这种
不合法的要求,而这名女婴的最后结局就是被抛弃.这样的事情在现今发展中国家
的中国何其寥寥.与其这样子去对待无辜的孩子,还不如让孩子们的生命在正规医
疗机构体面地终结.
我们仍旧处于发展中国家的行列,试问在当前中国的国情下,我们还有多少资源可
以用来做无用功?我们还有多少人力财力来做这种“不了”的情?试想一下,如果
我们可以把这些资源用在于建设国家,调整社会资源分配的方面,甚至,如果我们
可以把这些资源花费在医疗事业上,研究对付各种疾病的良药,这样的选择不是更
为妥当吗?
我们前面已经谈到,安乐死实施的对象是患上不治之症的绝症患者,实施的前提是
病人处于极其痛苦的情况下,在病人和其亲友的要求下,经医生认可,用人道方法
使病人在无痛苦状态中结束生命过程.这也就避免了安乐死是一种随意为他人选择
死亡的事实的存在.没有人愿意看到自己身边的人这样痛苦地慢慢离开,即便是伦
理道德,当面对人生苦痛这个最大的难题时,患者无能为力,我们也要眼睁睁看着
他们受苦吗.我们感受着这种痛苦,我们体会着这个中滋味,在无法选择的情况下
,我们选择了安乐死.这不是对生命的藐视,也不是道德的沦丧.反而,这是一种
在生命面临煎熬和磨难的时候,为我们身边的亲人,为我们爱着的人,选择另一条
更容易接受的道路.
因此,我方认为,安乐死是尊重生命的一种方式.
Zhengfang support euthanasia : Ladies and gentlemen, good evening.I
think we all know that survival is a matter of dignity and ethics,
and no one will be easy to choose to die,However, no one was
willing to take the "Unbearable Lightness of life."Our view :
euthanasia is a form of respect for life."Euthanasia" is a term
that derives from a Greek word meaning "happy" death.It has two
meanings : First, no painful death; Second, painless death; In
China the definition of euthanasia :The patients in critical
condition suffering from an incurable illness, because of the
extreme mental and physical suffering of patients and their
relatives in the request.medically approved method employing Road
patients to end their lives in a state without suffering; First,
from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients
themselves, is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek
advantages and avoid disadvantages, and no one would say, "I am
going to look painful, I had to go far from happy."When a person is
under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit, when the very
existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the
moral and ethical?The basic survival of the "length" are not able
to maintain, but also to talk about the breadth of life,we still
have to take into account the weight of ethics?Dr. Xu Jing and the
School of Law of Beijing University, believes that the
"constitution" stipulates that citizens from infringement of
personal liberty and human dignity.a specific meaning.The survival
of individual citizens the right to choose, under certain
conditions have the right to choose the manner of
death."Euthanasia" is a special case, not contrary to,community and
the interests of others under action taken by a special way of
life.This action is in strict conditions and procedures.Taiwan said
euthanasia is not free to choose death, but according to Dr. Xu's
theory,strictly in accordance with the conditions and procedures to
implement things.November 1, 1999, in patients with advanced
hepatocellular carcinoma who Guizhou distributed publicly disclosed
his thinking :"Who can help me achieve euthanasia? "According to
incomplete statistics,At present, hundreds of thousands of
terminally ill patients in great pain lying in hospital beds
life.One domestic Cancer Hospital had 800 cases of critically ill
patients suffering from cancer survey,because of unbearable pain,
death voluntary request (ask for euthanasia) accounted for more
than 30%.We would like to note the fact that in the end what?, The
right to life is enduring.Every law students should know that
survival is the most fundamental personal rights.However, when
survival is no longer continue to exist, we have to demand respect
for social ethics, but also to demand ethical known philosophical
systems.But why?Patients have "pain can be excruciating," and we
still have to talk about other so-called high-class stuff.For
critically ill patients, such acts, what does it mean?We would like
to tell you, this means that patients have to go on suffering means
that the patient must continue to be subject to torture.In such a
situation, can we say that they are the only people who can
understand that?We are real people ah, cruel things that struck!
Furthermore, from an objective point of view, euthanasia reduce the
burden on society, the distribution of social resources
conservation.China's present situation, we can clearly see that
society is in progress, butthe gap between us and other countries
is just so great.Sichuan Chengdu Shuangliu County, a 4-year-old
girl suffering from cancer dying, children of poor families money
to sustain their lives.verge of collapse father said : "I want my
ten euthanasia. "China's actual conditions,expect a poor family
used up the full cost of fighting the family to kill the children
to maintain a long lifeThis, in itself, is a predatory.Indeed, no
one can promising people the power to choose to die, no one can
easily let the others face death.Sichuan People's Hospital, the
second tumor doctors at the hospital, confirmed in an interview
:"Some parents see the ill child was born, so the child was thrown
into the roadside, goodhearted people expect to save him. "All of
the country's hospitals.Every year, there are many such
examples.These will be part of the abandoned children living in
institutions of social welfare, spent their lives in the final
period of their lives;However, a significant number of children
have been abandoned, because no one where he died.With a variety of
congenital heart diseases such as cataract and three-month-old
baby.Parents have been admitted to a hospital to "euthanasia."While
many people have agreed to let her from the bottom of "euthanasia",
but the hospital refused this legal requirements,This is the final
outcome of a baby being abandoned.Such a thing in a developing
country, China is now how far.Instead of treating innocent children
like this, would not allow their children to the end of a decent
life in the formal sector.We still developing inhe ranks, how in
the current situation,Wuyonggong be used for the amount of
resources we have?How much money and manpower we do "not"
intelligence?Let us imagine, if we can use the resources to build
national, adjust the distribution of social resources and even,If
we can integrate these resources spent on medical care, to deal
with the disease's minds.This option is not more appropriate?We
have already mentioned that the targeted euthanasia of patients
suffering from incurable diseases.The precondition is that patients
in very painful conditions, at the request of the patients and
their relatives, doctors recognizedRoad method employing state of
the patients at the end of life, pain-free process.This would avoid
the arbitrary euthanasia is a fact of the existence choose to die
for others.Nobody likes to see the people around them so painfully
slowly leave, even if it is ethical.When the biggest problem facing
life in pain, patients do, we have watched them suffer?.We feel
this suffering, we have come with this then you have no choice in
the circumstances, we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt
for life, nor is it moral decline.Instead, it was a time in the
lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the
people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore,
we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.
然而,不幸的是,人们不得不面对这样的事实：不管投入多少资源来设法推延死亡
和减少产生痛苦及残疾的风险,仍然有无数患有不治之症的患者实际上并不能避免
死亡,反而遭受着极其痛苦而难以忍受的延长死亡过程的医学干预.全世界每年大
约有五千万人走向死亡,其中相当一部分是被拖延了的死亡.据不完全统计,目前
在我国有数十万的绝症患者痛苦万分地躺在医院的病床上维持生命.国内一家肿瘤
医院曾对800例身患癌症的垂危患者进行调查统计,其中因为不堪忍受痛苦,自愿要
求死亡者（要求安乐死）占到30％以上.经验资料研究表明,在我国的医学实践中
,一方面在有条件的大医院同样存在着用昂贵的代价来维持脑死亡患者的"生命"的
现象（常常可见诸于报端）,另一方面,在对无法忍受痛苦的绝症患者的医疗处理
过程中,安乐死以隐秘或公开方式已经进行以久 .
Unfortunately, however, is that people have to face the facts :No
matter how many resources to try to delay death and reduce the risk
of suffering and disability.In fact there are still countless
terminally ill patients and can avoid deathInstead, the extension
of intolerable suffering and death is extremely painful process of
the medical intervention.Every year some 50 million people around
the world to death, which was delayed for a considerable number of
deaths.According to incomplete statistics, there are hundreds of
thousands of terminally ill patients in great pain lying in
hospital beds life.One domestic Cancer Hospital had 800 cases of
critically ill patients suffering from cancer survey,because of
unbearable pain, death voluntary request (ask for euthanasia)
accounted for more than 30%.Research and experience shows that the
medical practice in our country,one of the major hospitals in the
same conditions exist in the use of brain-dead patients to maintain
a high price for the "life" of (often found in the newspaper)the
other hand, the unbearable suffering of the terminally ill patients
in the medical treatment process,Euthanasia or to open the way for
a long time hidden.
提示：
想问下，你的论点是什么？
还是就安乐死发表自己的
观点？
你又说马上要，那你加我QQ
好了，我临时和你讲把，或者
你可以补充问题，我一直在线
类似问题
类似问题1：安乐死的辩论材料谁有,我18号要,比较急,不要复制别人的！
我晕,这是正确的啊,为什么不要?
这种题目本来就要是在网上找的嘛,不过帮你多归纳而已.
类似问题2：安乐死是否该合法推行的反方辩论材料
http://zsykxy.blog.163.com/blog/static/85223253201141185542383/
类似问题3：辩论赛求助：安乐死是否符合人道主义精神我们有个辩论赛是正方：安乐死符合人道主义精神、反方是安乐死不符合人道主义精神 我们在攻辩环节和自由辩论环节有什么问题可以问对方、或
虽然没有分,但是还给你几个关键点吧.
1.人道主义、人道主义精神的核心是什么?
2.“人”是不是人道主义精神的核心?
3.如果“安乐死”这种行为符合人道主义精神,那么：什么样的人可以安乐死,什么样的人可以决定是否对其使用“安乐死”?这么一种决定是否也符合人道主义精神?
假设一下：一个聋哑盲、四肢被截肢的病人,是否要用安乐死?是以其家人的意愿为准则,还是以其自我的意愿为准则?
类似问题4：辩论：求关于安乐死的支持论点对方说1.安乐死让人没希望2,无法得知病人是由于消极心理,还是病痛而选择.3,认定安乐死的过程复杂,可能导致很多人要死.我要怎么反驳,我没什么辩论经验,
1.人活着就是为了好好生活,而如果不能好好生活了选择安乐死也是可以理解的!
2.由于什么原因而选择并没有关系
3.现在的科技这么发达,过程复杂是可以克服的
类似问题5：要辩论关于安乐死是否被合法化我们是反方,反对安乐死被合法化请问有什么好的建议吗?
1 如果是我们生命垂危、意识模糊,医生要对我们进行安乐死,我们的亲人会愿意吗?将心比心,只要还有一线生机,谁都不能放弃!
2 17岁的少年子尤,胸腔穿刺数次,大小手术无数,承受着极大痛苦的他没有选择安乐死,而是笑着离开.子尤从未放弃微笑,那我们呢?
3 坚持下去就有希望!很多人选择安乐死,就是因为感到现实的绝望.然而,只要我心不死,生命就终会有所转机.
4很少听说有人在战场上自杀,也许正是因为战士们见多了生命的毁灭,比谁都更懂得珍惜.在选择安乐死之前,请想想我们面对的问题是否真的比战场还残酷!
5 父母给了我们生命,谁忍心让白发苍苍的他们看着自己的孩子逝去?即使有万分之一的希望,也要投入全部力量努力活下来,为了咱爸咱妈.
6 植物人也好,绝症加身也好,只要还有一丝呼吸,就让身边的人感到希望的存在,就像黑暗中微弱的烛光一样.别熄灭我们心中的烛光.
7 街上有多少乞丐连四肢都没有!有多少人和癌症抗争了大半生!我不言败,不去想如何死亡,只想如何走好漫漫人生路.
8 张国荣的纵身一跳和安乐死带给周围人的心灵之痛是一样的.人们可以接受自然的裁判,却无法忍受自我的了断.
9 比死亡更可怕的,是放弃生存的权利.哀莫大于心死,一个心灵死亡的人,才是最可悲的.
10 选择安乐死,是死亡战胜了勇气；选择坚强面对,是勇气战胜了死亡.
你可以按照这几点扩展一下你的发言稿.