英语翻译我要写一个罗拉快跑的观后感.尽量翻译简单一.
编辑： admin 2017-26-03
-
4
Is the world's most complex organisms.Everyone has their own destiny.Relatively independent of the fate of people,and is interwoven.Is the fate of countless species is not possible because of a certain factors change?This Everything must be decided by a Lalla girls to interpret.
Roller in the running.Her in 20 minutes in order to get 100,000 marks,to save the life of her boyfriend and running.Her tireless running.Her a one Chuanzhaocuqi every step are racing against time……
80 minutes of the film,running three rollers.Twice before running return only she or her boyfriend's death.Roller unwilling,so the last time,she succeeded.Boyfriend recovery in the loss of hundreds of thousands of subway mark Heilaoda paid to the poor,and rollers from the casino win to another 100,000.director has given us a satisfactory outcome.roller Peixiao the holding 100,000 marks.
Roller run in the process,she encountered the boys and dogs,pushed baby carriages woman,and my father's friends,ambulances,female bank staff… ..As the rollers three different running,so that they have also taken place in the destiny of change.because of a change in a link,so the fate of the entire chain has changed.life there,it was dead,some sad,some-hi.roller All this because the run.
We do not also rollers?We do not also in the running is?Some money to run,it was to love and running,it was to their studies and running,it was right to run…… the world,and countless rollers,in order to target run,and struggle.our run,and the number of affected people and to change the fate of so many people?
Light red hair in rollers,like a flame in the markets Bencuan.Like that in the combustion.Person's life is like a roller to run this course in 20 minutes,although in this process there are numerous choices and the possibility of accidental,but We always can only choose one of them.Once the choice,the time could not turn the clock back,it can change destiny.
类似问题
类似问题1： 英语翻译Andatnightjustasthelightisturnedisturnedoff,wecanhearthemcomeoutfromtheholes,singingjoy,greetingeachotheranddiscussingwhattodo.Then,theybegintowork,first,noisecomesfromthebookshelves.Theymustber[英语科目]
晚上的时候,当灯被关掉的时候,我们可以听到他们来自洞里,歌唱快乐,彼此问候,讨论该做什么.然后,他们开始工作,首先,噪音来自书架.他们肯定是在阅读.一只一所名牌大学里的老鼠一定是受过良好的教育,也许他们所有的人都在学习上很勤奋.然后,一张纸掉在了地上.它可能是一张试卷.他们中间的每个人将会度过一段难熬的时光.过了一会,我们桌子上的碗开始作响.他们肯定是饿了,想吃东西了.最后,他们开始唱歌,热情、开心,就像在一场持续整晚的派对一样.
类似问题2： 【英语翻译AgathaChristiewasbornonSeptember15th,1890.Shedidn’tgotoschoolbecausehermotherwantedtoteachherathome.ShestudiedthepianoandsinginginParis.Shegotmarriedin1914toapilot(飞行员)andtheyhadonedaughter.Du】百度作业帮[英语科目]
阿加莎·克里斯蒂出生于1890年9月15日.她没有上学,因为她的母亲想在家里教她.她曾在巴黎学习钢琴演奏和唱歌.她在1914年与一个飞行员结婚并且育有一个女儿.第一次世界大战期间,她在做护士的时候开始写侦探小说.在医院里,她学到了很多有关药物的知识并且把它们运用到了她的小说里.
1920年,她写了第一部小说.主人公赫尔克里·波洛是一名侦探.这本书很快就成为畅销书,使她闻名于世.
1928年,阿加莎·克里斯蒂失踪了.两个星期后,警方发现了她.她什么都不知道.这是在所有英国报纸的头版消息,甚至在今天,也没有人知道拿两个星期内在她身上到底发生了什么事.
1929年,阿加莎·克里斯蒂前往中东度假.1930年她回到了英格兰的家中 .后来,她与她丈夫多次区中东旅行,并且她后来的很多故事就发生在这里,例如,《尼罗河谋杀案》.她还写了侦探小说《马普尔小姐探案》,并开始从事戏剧的创作.《捕鼠器》就是其中的一部,1952年在伦敦西区的一个剧院上演,它的影响一直持续到现在.
在她的一生中,她创作了将近80部侦探小说.她还用玛丽·维斯马科特这个笔名创作了其他小说.她死于1976年1月终年86岁.
阿加莎·克里斯蒂的侦探小说,都是以令人惊诧的结局而著名.
类似问题3： 请英语高手帮我翻译下这篇文章啊.急要的看过电影的桥段,自己就天真的以为凭着自己的努力,自己的恒心可以去改变一个人,虽然知道她爸爸都无法改变她的,凭什么我可以改变,但是总是相信
Seen the movie's plot in its own naive to think that his own efforts,their perseverance can change a person that knows her father could not change her,how I can change,but always believed that their It is too much social reality,she was never like me?She said she never care about me,even friendship,she also bearish,then I can with what I fell in love with her new?Two people together,the two sides in the end what is needed?Woman needs a man to help her charge calls,the need for men to buy her clothes.The men and women need each other to meet the demand.That is what the so-called love?Tear the face,and this is the true face of love?
类似问题4： 帮忙翻译这段文章,拜托拉,急要!It'sthefifthdooralongfromyours,'saidthemanager."Thankyou,'saidjohn."Safetycomesfirst,doesn'tit?""Yed,sir,"saidthemanager.Hethendescribedjohn'sroomtohim,andleft.Johnt[英语科目]
“那是在你们前面的第五扇门”经理说到.
约翰说,“安全第一,对吧?”
经理回答到：“是的.”经理接着为他描述了约翰的房间,然后离开了.
约翰告诉我们接下来发生的事.
“我很累就睡了.查理把我叫醒了,他拉我的毯子.我闻到了烟的味道!着火了!就在那时,警钟声消失了,我走过去摸了摸门,门非常烫手所以我就没有打开它.我把一些毛巾弄湿然后把它们塞到了门下方的缝隙中.
“电话坏了,所以e s,oke （是什么）进来了.我和查理并排躺在地板上等待着.当我们听到消防车的声音的时候仿佛听到了悦耳的音乐.
“我打开窗户,一边挥手一边大叫,查理brked（是什么）不久,一个消防队员出现了,但是他并不想把查理也救出去.“那不符合规定”他说到.几秒钟之后,我和查理都安全的待在了广场上,我就了查理一命,同时,他也救了我一命.
类似问题5： 【英语翻译不要翻译软件翻译的文章!本文需要寄到澳洲,由于本人水平有限,】百度作业帮[英语科目]
The Delphi technique is a method for obtaining forecasts from a panel of independent experts over two or more rounds. Experts are asked to predict quantities. After each round, an administrator provides an anonymous summary of the experts’ forecasts and their reasons for them. When experts’ forecasts have changed little between rounds, the process is stopped and the final round forecasts are combined by averaging. Delphi is based on well-researched principles and provides forecasts that are more accurate than those from unstructured groups (Rowe and Wright 1999, Rowe and Wright 2001).
The technique can be adapted for use in face-to-face meetings, and is then called mini-Delphi or Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE). Delphi has been widely used in business.
Free software to support Delphi forecasting and references are available on the Principles of Forecasting site.
[edit] History of the Delphi method
The Delphi method was developed, over a period of years, at the Rand Corporation at the beginning of the cold war to forecast the impact of technology on warfare. [1] A number of events influenced the development.
In 1944, General Arnold ordered the creation of the report for the U.S. Air Force on the future technological capabilities that might be used by the military. Two years later, Douglas Aircraft company started Project RAND to study "the broad subject of inter-continental warfare other than surface".
Different approaches were tried, but the shortcomings of traditional forecasting methods, such as theoretical approach, quantitative models or trend extrapolation, in areas where precise scientific laws have not been established yet, quickly became apparent. To combat these shortcomings, the Delphi method was developed in RAND Corporation during the 1950-1960s (1959) by Olaf Helmer, Norman Dalkey, and Nicholas Rescher.[1]
The Delphi method was used by Rand Experts when they were asked to give their opinion on the probability, frequency and intensity of possible enemy attacks. Other experts could anonymously give feedback. This process was repeated several times till a consensus emerged.
[edit] Role of the facilitator
The person co-ordinating the Delphi method can be known as a facilitator, and facilitates the responses of their panel of experts, who are selected for a reason, usually that they hold knowledge on an opinion or view. The facilitator sends out questionnaires, surveys etc. and if the panel of experts accept, they follow instructions and present their views. Responses are collected and analysed, then common and conflicting viewpoints are identified. If consensus is not reached, the process continues through thesis and antithesis, to gradually work towards synthesis, and building consensus.
[edit] The Delphi method and forecasting
The Delphi method is a systematic interactive forecasting method based on independent inputs of selected experts.
The name "Delphi" derives from the Oracle of Delphi. The authors of the method were not happy with this name, because it implies "something oracular, something smacking a little of the occult", whereas in reality precisely the opposite is involved. The Delphi method recognizes the value of expert opinion, experience and intuition and allows using the limited information available in these forms, when full scientific knowledge is lacking.
Delphi method uses a panel of carefully selected experts who answer a series of questionnaires. Questions are usually formulated as hypotheses, and experts state the time when they think these hypotheses will be fulfilled. Each round of questioning is followed with the feedback on the preceding round of replies, usually presented anonymously. Thus the experts are encouraged to revise their earlier answers in light of the replies of other members of the group. It is believed that during this process the range of the answers will decrease and the group will converge towards the "correct" answer. After several rounds the process is complete and the median scores determine the final answers. From that the road-map or timetables of future developments can be derived.
The following key characteristics of the Delphi method help the participants to focus on the issues at hand and separate Delphi from other methodologies:
Structuring of information flow
Regular feedback
Anonymity of the participants
[edit] Structuring of information flow
The initial contributions from the experts are collected in the form of answers to questionnaires and their comments to these answers. The panel director controls the interactions among the participants by processing the information and filtering out irrelevant content. This avoids the negative effects of face-to-face panel discussions and solves the usual problems of group dynamics.
[edit] Regular feedback
Participants comment on their own forecasts, the responses of others and on the progress of the panel as a whole. At any moment they can revise their earlier statements. While in regular group meetings participants tend to stick to previously stated opinions and often conform too much to group leader, the Delphi method prevents it.
[edit] Anonymity of the participants
Usually all participants maintain anonymity. Their identity is not revealed even after the completion of the final report. This stops them from dominating others in the process using their authority or personality, frees them to some extent from their personal biases, minimizes the "bandwagon effect" or "halo effect", allows them to freely express their opinions, encourages open critique and admitting errors by revising earlier judgments.
[edit] Applications
First applications of the Delphi method were in the field of science and technology forecasting. The objective of the method was to combine expert opinions on likelihood and expected development time, of the particular technology, in a single indicator. One of the first such reports, prepared in 1964 by Gordon and Helmer, assessed the direction of long-term trends in science and technology development, covering such topics as scientific breakthroughs, population control, automation, space progress, war prevention and weapon systems.
Later the Delphi method was applied in other areas, especially those related to public policy issues, such as economic trends, health and education. It was also applied successfully and with high accuracy in business forecasting. For example, in one case reported by Basu and Schroeder (1977), the Delphi method predicted the sales of a new product during the first two years with inaccuracy of 3–4% compared with actual sales. Quantitative methods produced errors of 10–15%, and traditional unstructured forecast methods had errors of about 20%.
[edit] Acceptance
Overall the track record of the Delphi method is mixed. There have been many cases when the method produced poor results. Still, some authors attribute this to poor application of the method and not to the weaknesses of the method itself. It must also be realised that in areas such as science and technology forecasting the degree of uncertainty is so great that exact and always correct predictions are impossible, so a high degree of error is to be expected.
Another particular weakness of the Delphi method is that future developments are not always predicted correctly by iterative consensus of experts, but instead by unconventional thinking of amateur outsiders.
One of the initial problems of the method was its inability to make complex forecasts with multiple factors. Potential future outcomes were usually considered as if they had no effect on each other. Later on, several extensions to the Delphi method were developed to address this problem, such as cross impact analysis, that takes into consideration the possibility that the occurrence of one event may change probabilities of other events covered in the survey. Still the Delphi method can be used most successfully in forecasting single scalar indicators.
Despite these shortcomings, today the Delphi method is a widely accepted forecasting tool and has been used successfully for thousands of studies in areas varying from technology forecasting to drug abuse.
[edit] Delphi applications not aiming at consensus
Traditionally the Delphi method has aimed at a consensus of the most probable future by iteration. The Policy Delphi launched by Murray Turoff instead is a decision support method aiming at structuring and discussing the diverse views of the preferred future. The Argument Delphi developed by Osmo Kuusi focuses on ongoing discussion and finding relevant arguments rather than focusing on the output. The Disaggregative Policy Delphi developed by Petri Tapio uses cluster analysis as a systematic tool to construct various scenarios of the future in the latest Delphi round. The respondent's view on the probable and the preferable future are dealt with as separate cases.
[edit] Directing the flow to a predetermined goal
The Delphi Technique can also be abused to give an appearance of community input when in reality the facilitator is directing the flow to a predetermined goal.
德尔菲法（Delphi method）是对预防政策的评价,审核的一种流行病学方法.
该政策的预防,评价领导小组通过匿名方式对专家们进行几轮征询意见.领导小组对每一轮的专家意见进行汇总整理,并将整理过的材料再寄给每位专家,供专家们分析判断,专家在整理后材料的基础上提出新的论证意见.如此多次反复,意见逐步趋于一致,得到一个比较一致的并且可靠性较大的结论或方案.
德尔菲法是系统分析方法在意见和价值判断领域内的一种有效方法.它突破了传统的数量分析限制,为更合理地制订政策开阔思路.
http://www.istis.sh.cn/updata/editor/UploadFile/20041019131733689.pdf
http://www.istis.sh.cn/updata/editor/UploadFile/20041019131659618.pdf